Creating a Private Law Society, in which each person commits only to what he can commit to, that is, he signs contracts according to the assets he has to offer as collateral, is the closest thing to liberty there is.

Many contracts that exist in the state are feasible solely because individuals, in order to "participate in the state system," give up their freedom as collateral. However, while this argument may seem hyperbolic, it holds true.

State justice only “works” because, eventually, the state retains the authority to apprehend individuals, regardless of their consent.

So, a Private Law Society means more than just choosing the contracts you would like to sign, but knowing that you will never give up your freedom as collateral.

Several types of contracts that the state can enforce are only binding because individuals have something very valuable as a guarantee: their liberty.

Thus, take part in a Private Law Society involves acknowledging that certain "solutions" will no longer exist.

Yes, living in liberty, in this regard, presents greater challenges.

Yes, living in liberty is fairer in all aspects.

As a matter of fact, defending liberty means refusing to surrender it as collateral.