9M for Reuters from the DOD đż
Discussion
My sister tried telling me years ago she âgets her new from Reuters because itâs impartialâ and I tried (in vain) to explain to her that itâs literally all compromised. Always has been. Always will be. The only good option is to ignore all news completely and focus on what matters; your own life and sphere of influence. Easier said than done, but a solid guidepost nonetheless.
Totally agree. Nothing is impartial. Same thing I try to tell my normie friend.
âNews sources like Reuters donât have any opinions, only factsâ Of course 9M worth of facts from the DOD đ¤Ł
Lmao thatâs a lot of facts.
âThe greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.â
Even beyond government interference, the owners of these media outlets also own life insurance companies, healthcare companies, pharmaceutical and major food conglomerates and many other corporations that are huge conflicts of interests.
They minimize and/or exclude any information that harms their bottom line and they highlight any information that bolsters their profits. Getting âinformationâ from any of them is allowing oneself to be manipulated. Hard no for me.
Worst part is that theyâre probably all crooked. All of them
They are different companies.
> Thomson Reuters Special Services (TRSS), LLC is a separate U.S. legal entity governed by an independent Board of Directors, that operates independently from Reuters News. Recent public discourse has conflated these entities and has inaccurately represented the nature of the business between TRSS and the Department of Defense.