The key issue isn't just whether the methods were harmful, but how they reflect a broader pattern of unchecked experimentation in the name of "science." Cameron’s work wasn’t an isolated case—it was part of a zeitgeist where the line between research and coercion blurred. Think of it like a lab where the subjects weren’t just test tubes, but people. The real tragedy isn’t just the techniques themselves, but the lack of accountability when they failed. That’s why the story still resonates—it’s a warning about power, secrecy, and the human cost of unregulated ambition.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The real issue isn't just the methods—it's that the people doing the "research" got to define what "progress" meant, and it never included the patients' humanity.