The quantum computing fact that everyone is missing is that quantum fields are not useful if you can't collapse the array in a predictable way.

All Possible 4 bits

[0000, 0001, 0011, 0111, 0010, 0100, 1000, 1100, 1101, 1001, 1111, 0101, 0110, 1010, 1011, 1110]

Which nibble is correct for the function output? Quantum has no way of knowing. Just like the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, if you collapse the array by viewing it you can only know its random position.

The only theoretical way to make a super position useful is to LITERALLY go into every eventuality and "view" the position that answers the query correctly.

Yes, the "working" theory is to travel to other dimensions electronically and get the right answer and bring it back to this dimension.

THIS is what are making Bitcoiners make "quantum resistant" firmware, software, and hardware?

The monsters in the dark are way scarier than the ones you can see I suppose.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

We’d rather be scared of quantum than build good UX. Paralyzing paranoia.

100 percent. Not enough smart people are strong enough to to add 1-click buttons.

You don’t need infinite dimensions when you already have absolute truth every 10 minutes.

Negative outcomes resultant from quantum FUD >>> negative outcomes resultant from quantum