I'm probably a minority in how I use Nostr and zaps though. That should be considered. Zapping a list of devs for me is a lot of work since my external wallet opens and processes a payment for each one. My opinion may not matter so much for this issue. Implement it with an option to disable and people like me will probably be just fine. I may even change my habits. Never know. I accept your point about incentives though. I think your way is more sound in that regard.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The main issue is that on an yearly basis the list of devs to be paid would be bigger. We don't even track that much time, so it would be interesting to figure out how to do this.

Maybe with the integration with cashu the payment for multiple devs will be made easier. Would you load some amount into a Mint just to have a single-click pay-all interface?

Absolutely. I kind of already do this with a fiat bank for all the FOSS apps that only accept fiat. Mints are a very similar concept except have far better privacy.

My main concern for using Mints (in the US) has been the whole money transmitter thing. I'm skeptical of how that's going to play out, but that's a separate issue.

At the end of the day, I just want to be fair and support you guys long term. I tend to check out at various points and simply can't watch every piece of software to make sure I care about every decision. But that IS on me and I'm willing to pay however devs think is fair. I'll just have to adjust some of my habits and that's fine as long as it isn't too cumbersome.