yea gpt4. I saw some comparisons to llama 3.1, presuming its similar ? I don't know the tech specs or how far the consciousness part goes, but i made a mental note that its kinda emo in comparison to 3.5 (gpt). btw if you ever do an idiots guide to building your ostrish 70B, would love to read it
Discussion
yep. llama3.1 is almost beating the top 3 big corp llms and it is free!!
as for consciousness, if you can define consciousness maybe i can answer =)
what kind of emo was it? you can dm if you want.
No worries, but do you know how to remove Rejon from this convo? I added him earlier for HW designs, but the discussion has shifted and i wouldn't want to spam his notification.
what are the 3 big corps ? Microsoft's Open AI, Google's Gemini and Bert - and the 3rd ? what are your thoughts on other open source models Mistral AI and Claude ? Jack shared a list of models as well.
a lot of my explorations are on gpt at this point but i'm hoping to get a second hand gpu 🤞 to establish a localised model. Otherwise i'm going to build circuits for it which will take longer.
i first made this mental note on consciousness when i was gauging its response over a situation analysis and i thought it was more methodological with 3.5 and compassionate with 4.0. But i also notice that the vibe changes from time to time. i presume you would have a better comparison as both your products are on a high opinion mode - how do emotions come into play for you ?
if i was to edit the raw json, i could remove the 'p' tag. but on primal i don't think it is possible.
claude is the third. it not open source tho. mistral is also a hero. they released today something that does better in coding i guess than llama 3.1.
yes, all my gpu's are used. i think this tech may be underrated. people should play more with these models. you could fine tune the model with lots of romance novels and it will get emo for you, no problem. =) but i don't think they are conscious as a human. a human has "feelings", "soul", ... lots of other faculties. one thing machines will never do imo is dreams (at night).
i fine tune the model for knowledge on certain areas. emotially it may be awkward as a nerd =)
Yea, I'd think this tech just makes everything you build easier, smoother and faster, and it's easier to make a user-friendly product. What are your thoughts on products with customers and removing the ownerships of data from it . If there were some form of end to end encryption or deidentification of data between customers and the product owner, that might make the data of the product owner more secure. But how do the main models like llama ensure its privacy and remove data viewability while processing on its model ?
* correction - the goal is to make the customers data more secured that only they own it
not sure if i understand it but llm companies didn't care much about copyright/user data. courts seem to be favoring them. i think it could start more ethical in the beginning, i.e. when generating money the llm companies could pay authors royalties too. but i am now wondering how will llm companies stay alive now that llama3.1 are free and so on.
perhaps. i need to study the privacy aspect more. but it would be great if this shifts the dynamics of all taking on the open source route, more models spread out. thanks for the great insights, appreciate the thought exchanges.