"If 'free' energy devices were possible, we would have them by now."

https://video.nostr.build/0e1a3a413e2ad9cb7078bf57ff6b84f1d3bb0146ecbec35dac1cb837b0f661fc.mp4

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

TANSTAAFL

Wouldn't Bitcoin miners have been all over this by now instead of dealing with the current energy sources? lol

I have definitely wondered about the impact on Bitcoin when something like this comes to fruition, if they ever manage to get the tech out there. This is one of the cases where I think a working prototype and complete open-sourcing would be the only viable way to get it out there without getting eliminated in the process.

The term is a misnomer though. All it would be, at least in the early iterations, is a device that has a higher energy output than input. It wouldn't be "free", but the right field array configuration would make it possible, and from what I have seen so far, I feel quite confident that it is possible, and it is very likely these exist in many forms already. I think most people believe it is fiction because the modern, mainstream understanding of electrical field theory is wrong.

How would this energy source work? I'm no energy expert, but I don't get how we would just pull energy out of something at super low costs, they've been chasing the fusion dream for ages now

Surely someone would have leaked it and dare I say it, if there was such valuable info, you could just embed it in the bitcoin blockchain if someone wanted the world to know about it

There are many people who claim to be working on it. Others who have worked on this and threatened disclosure have always died under suspicious circumstances. Most recently and notably was Amy Eskridge. I mean, think of what is at stake for those who have a monopoly on the present means we rely on. I do believe that another limiting factor of disclosure is greed.

My present understanding is that it is all predicated on first and foremost understanding of the aether, from which all energy is 'manifested', which would be the more accurate way of describing the process (nothing is being 'generated'). The aether is energy at rest, pure inertia, and it has different modalities which are manipulated through frequency and vibration. When using steam, water, coal or wind to 'convert' kinetic energy into electrical energy, we are in fact creating the conditions for manifesting electrical energy from the aether, rather than 'converting' the energy, which James Maxwell himself called an illusion.

Without getting too technical, many of the 'fathers' of field theory understood that there are two known geometric shapes when it comes to fields - the magnetic torus, and the dielectric hyperboloid (hourglass shape), which is surrounded by the torus. This is observable with any magnet under a ferrocell, where we can see these shapes and how the two fields interact with eachother. When you introduce movement (vibration and frequency) through space, you have the 4 factors required for the manifestation of electricity. When Tesla invented the AC motor, what he did was invert these fields, so you have the magnetic field surrounded by the dielectric field, and that discovery is what paved the way for our electrical grid.

Another way to look at it is think about when humans first encountered water, then the realization that through temperature modulation that it changed its state to ice, and then at some point we figured out that heat would produce steam. These are means of manipulating water into different states, even though it is fundamentally still water. It is no different than using field geometry arrangements (an arch form) to manipulate the state of the aether, and given the right conditions, it would be possible to create an arch form which doesn't suffer the atmospheric limitations that current processes do (solid state, no moving parts).

Here is a short explanation of this by Ken Wheeler, if you were interested.

https://youtu.be/xFLDsyrlTG4

I am also skeptical of these claims, however both the big bang and simulation theory support the idea of free energy. So do religious and spiritual theories, many of which are anecdotally confirmed by millions of first hand experiences.

Energy could easily become 'free' in a practical sense, regardless.