nostr:npub1wrn7rqj4ugvly7ezhf77p8l04rp3ccyk8pj804ukae349j9gkxaqtfqdxf nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub16m7n8agwsdt3yhyfdmjrpvsw9w4dxgh9676w5z8jnppva65q7dgqw9f74w nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk nostr:npub13xhpusxfq9frzvjh896z4ukd2s8dxthqqq5py7fgu9qrxfr8f09sqe9x2y

OK but this was also the norm in continental europe, which was orders of magnitude poorer.

This trend is also normal for the middle ages.

I'm asking Gabe to explain what happened, and the closest he's come is the usual gish gallop about africans.

I just had a look at the thread to understand the argument.

I'm making the point in argument to mongoose that very little occurred in the 1800s to induce any sort of mutation in White Americans.

I believe you chaps (Gabe and Mongoose) are arguing about girls in some way and their behaviour today being shaped from some generations ago.

Do I have this correct?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.