I equate gender-fluidness with religion because the two things are based exactly on the same premises with the blatant equation identity = soul. Gender fluidness is not a new thing and has happened to humanity over millennia various times at different stages, is an archetype. Nobody sane of mind would find something wrong with the sexual orientation of a person. The issue is wanting to change society which is in a sense a living organism by itself to which we are bound. Like it or not we need to reproduce and in vitro is *not* a good or sufficient nor equalitarian mean of procreation. P.S. look up “behavioral sink” on google. If I am not wrong the experiment from which the term comes is known as “universe 21”
Discussion
Will definitely look that up. I have to disagree about the rest, but understand that this is simply because I grew in an environment which made me strongly believe trans people have just as many rights as cis people. I understand what you mean about changing society, though I would change it in a way that makes it become more tolerant since I really think everyone should be treated equally.
Also, I don't understand how anyone can keep thinking the right is the right point of view since they have mistreated everyone different than them since the dawn of time (e.g. the confederates)
I don’t see how stating simple biological facts is refusing trans rights. It’s simply a wrong logical conclusion.