Nostr Web Client

Here's how we do it with Podcasting 2.0 value4value

https://github.com/Podcastindex-org/podcast-namespace/blob/main/value/value.md

I’ve brought up payment intervals to some core nostr devs.

it’s just the premise that a zap would be split with the relay it’s on… when I could of read it from 3 relays I’ve connected too… and when after that zap occurs it could end up on another relay. Doesn’t quite compute with how nostr’s reach fundamentally works.

Alternatively, a relay could let you link a LN wallet, like fountain fm does.. and set up payment intervals, and offer to split that funding through current zaps to the notes that are sent to your client.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Adam Curry 2y ago

Fountain uses Podcasting 2.0 V4V, which works on keysend, this is the main difference with zaps

It requires an 'always on' receiving node

yunginter.net 2y ago

Yes, but you got it backwards… the split should be the payment interval that the relay always receives… and the content creator gets when they provide content to the relay.

and if people want to tip on top of that, they can and relays shouldn’t have their hands in that… not just because it should go straight to the creator, but because of how rebroadcasting works for reach on nostr.

yunginter.net 2y ago

put the buzz word zap aside… a relay that charges with payment intervals… and splits to the creators.. is a 5 star idea.

What your suggesting, splitting zaps, would have relays fighting to host content.. and anyone can rebroadcast… so everyone would, and there would be 100 relays fighting for this split.

yunginter.net 2y ago

I would just post my ln address and ask people to donate there if they like my content…

but a relay that pays me a tiny split when I do provide content to them… makes a whole tone of sense.

halalmoney 2y ago

How about an “add sats” feature to introduce a queuing system to the broadcast of notes? This feature could be switched on by Nostr clients when high traffic volumes are detected.

In turn, the split of sats revenue could also involve the client taking a cut for facilitating the payment.

————————

Penny Problem Gap: Economists assume demand is linear, but people’s behavior totally changes once an action costs money. If the inventors of the Internet had known about it, spam wouldn’t be such a problem. If sending an email cost you $0.001, there’d be way less spam.

yunginter.net 2y ago

a client could charge and run payment or delivery intervals for serving and rebroadcasting notes… and then split that with the content creators. But “zaps” should remain a direct form of payment to the creator. Just as podcasting 2.0 is creator focused.

yunginter.net 2y ago

at the end of the day… I will just share my ln address and ask for payment there as a creator. Just as no agenda asks for donations outside of payment intervals.

the reverse works and give a great reason to pay for your client and relay…. Because part of that pays for the content.