In a nutshell, its working as desinged, driving deflationary pressure and adoption. If it aint broke, don't fix it. Just because technically a change can be done, if not required for fundamental use case, one has to ask if the desire to do so is ego based or bad actor. Natural reaction. What I don't understand is if this has caused such a huge debate, its obviously not desired by many, if working well right now and adoption increasing, why not stop the change and engage in more discussion and (healthy, polite) debate?