But you say: Giving money to someone is consent to being scammed.
So buying food is consent to being poisoned.
I only repeat what you said on other examples. And it shows you that you are wrong but selective perception won't let you even think about being wrong here.
So there's no difference between scam and robbery?
The underlying scheme is robbery. Though scammers use more sophisticated ways to get your money or property than robbers. But they both rob you.
Can you choose not to invest in a scam? Can you choose not to be robbed? One you can say no, the other you cannot. That's the point
I can say "no" to invest in a scam when I know it is a scam. When it is an investmentproposal I only say yes to the investment.
It's exactly the point. You can decide to go out on the street. But you are not responsible for being robbed. Same goes for investing.
Can we agree that if a person falls into a scan the person has some responsibility for that choice, while a person being robbed has zero responsibility about it?
