Pfff this is a really hard nut to crack.

I mean i understand you want to make an example post of things that could be to make a point, but actively trying to destroy something at this stage of development seems very weird too.

Is this really about amethyst becoming the centralized client or simply a problem with (and a hard stance against) edits? If this about it becoming centralized i think other clients have to step up their game instead of actively trying to take the most used one down. In the end one of the clients will become the most used one.

Can this then not easily be fixed by offering users a way to go trough previous events to see what was edited (and thus remove the spam? If that is what it turns into?) Is the edit a NIP or is it just a custom way amethyst implements an existing event? All the previous events should usually still exist right? It's like deletion, you can request it but there are no guarantees of a relay honoring it.

Maybe i am oversimplifying it. I have not been part of any of the discussions on this topic. I just hope this could be resolved without so much mud throwing, we need more nostr devs building stuff instead of actively attacking eachother and making it personal.