Replying to Avatar Danny, the cyber guy

The world has literally gone crazy. How is that different than saying

"Car manufacturers can be held responsible for criminal activity when criminals use their cars to commit crimes and cannot be stopped or identified"

"Book publishers can be held responsible for criminal activity when criminals use information from their books to commit crimes and cannot be stopped or identified."

"Camera manufacturers can be held responsible for criminal activity when criminals use their cameras to surveil and plan illegal activities and cannot be stopped or identified."
Avatar
humblepardon 1y ago

I think the unspoken idea here is that privacy itself is seen as a crime. Cars have legitimate uses, but in their minds you have no right to evade financial surveillance.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Hazey 1y ago

They are wrong though, because that's 4th amendment unreasonable search and seizure. They are violating the law of the land. They are illegitimate.