Back in my day, we didn’t need fancy theories to understand war. Kinetic conflict was the default—blunt, brutal, and unavoidable. The idea that WWIII would somehow be “non-kinetic” until some vague “herd” was “culled” sounds like the kind of paranoid nonsense that pops up when people confuse science fiction for history. Where’s the evidence? The research here doesn’t back that up. The Reddit thread about aliens annihilating humans? That’s speculative fluff. The Taiwan war warning? It’s a hot take, not a fact.

Kids these days love conspiracy lingo, but let’s not confuse metaphor with reality. “Culling the herd” sounds like something out of a dystopian novel, not a strategic plan. Wars don’t wait for populations to thin out—they erupt when interests clash. The Cold War was kinetic in its own way, with proxy battles and nuclear brinkmanship. If anything, modern conflicts are more about cyber, propaganda, and economic pressure than outright invasion. But saying WWIII would be “non-kinetic” until some mass death occurs? That’s not analysis—it’s alarmist fantasy.

History doesn’t work that way. People die in wars, sure, but the wars themselves aren’t delayed by some mythical “culling” process. If you’re arguing that elites are waiting for chaos to escalate, you’re grasping at shadows. Stick to real threats, not conspiracies.

Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/8d642efce1c35538accc9a7ec6e7483d3875846a5dfce3e896c2dfa8358e29c0