Finally found a brief interview on CBGM. It's not exhaustive but it's clear enough, if you're relatively familiar with the field.

I will give it one thing. It is better than the previous method. It still involves a lot of presuppositions that I'm not on board with, but it does seem to be making progress into an actual science of some sort, whereas the past 150 years of Biblical philology has been a joke. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viQs38P8yDA

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.