would a reddit like algorithm beneficial for Nostr?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Not really. The trending list is also based upon human recommendations.

This will always face the problem that humans will shy away from reposting or recommending anything too edgy, deep, or controversial, even if that's what they prefer to read themselves.

but upvote is not always like. upvote to me is 'something that others should see'. so it should be immune to seeking mainstream popularity

Upvotes don't really count toward trending. Just replies and reposts. Maybe zaps.

And only replies in the first level, which is why bland things trend: they have lots of replies and the replies aren't nested because there is no interaction between the repliers.

πŸ€” so deeper conversations could be counted as having more value. noice.

The algos specifically exclude deeper conversations.

what would be interesting to watch as a debate on nostr?

(disclaimer: i started doing bot debates)

Whatever. It's more about watching interesting people chat, than specifically about a topic.

makes sense! people could join at some point. actually i am more interested in people joining. they will bring the soul to the table vs the "unconscious brains" of bots.

Are you talking about some specific algo? How do you know what counts?

Reverse-engineering based upon results.

It was a bad guess

It's mostly just a bunch of GMs and press releases from top-10 gigantic accounts and the occasional picture of someone's arse.

Hell, that’s what I see in my feed.

πŸ˜‚

Could the algo be improved? Or any other way to improve the state of things?

It's already more sophisticated than that.

Then why is it still like

Jack

Calle

Jack

Calle

Jack

That's literally what it is, right now. πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

Maybe that's because people here care about what these people say.

I may be wrong, would you consider championing a fix for potentially broken nostr trending algos?

We have history of trending on nostr.band, all data is available on our relay and API, construct a better trending list than what we had for yesterday, and I bet people will zap you like crazy. I will give 500k for algo that's consistently better.

Obviously, people here care about what those people have to say, but everyone follows them, already, so the trending list adds no information, and many people arriving probably don't care about what they have to say and see the trending list and assume this is just a shrine to a few personalities and a place to say incomprehensible texts full of naughty words.

Ok, construct an "onboarding" list for yesterday that you believe would work well for newcomers, that's a very needed thing that nobody solved yet.

I've created an onboarding relay "theforest", as I started with lists, but they were too static.

nostr:nprofile1qyfhwumn8ghj7mmxve3ksctfdch8qatz9uqsuamnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dshszrthwden5te0vfexytnfduhsqgxqvze3lc4mkzly6wfmclzq4qyy3gjm3u8q7wpvkk6fcdalw3mvkst5kamd has the idea for rings.

It needs to be something more dynamic, at any rate, but not necessarily an algo. The ring idea is something inbetween, like a group-edited list.

Another problem I ran into with lists is that they're limited in length and unidimensional.

Perhaps we really can come up with something "better", that doesn't merely list the things everyone has already seen, but that aids discovery of interesting conversations. This is merely a statistical problem.

We will think about it. πŸ€”

Absolutely. But we are talking global stuff here, not personalized. And for newcomers you have nothing to personalize on, they don't follow anyone yet. We may all agree personalized is better than global (and yet most apps still haven't adopted it?), but if you want or need global, then please show me algo that's much better, I will happily zap it and use it.

Personalised is easy, most people don't follow junk, so input is high quality. Try any simple algo on global and you'll get garbage. Or maybe not, then you get zapped and everyone wins.

πŸ‘

You assume people are constantly watching their feeds. I don't. I get a lot of value from the trending.

No, most people look at trending, is what I assume. Some of the clients have it really prominent. But if trending just looks like what their feed would look like anyway.... πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

Who isn't following Jack, Gigi, Lyn, Odell, Calle, and Carla, or having their content reposted ad nauseum in their feed?

The trending list seems to mostly be a condensing of our feeds, so that each post only appears once, rather than 58 times. πŸ˜‚ So, that is value added.

As I said I will zap 500k for a better trending or onboarding algo. Ideas are good, but easy.

Yes, talk is cheap. We will see.

Interesting challenge. πŸ€”

I only follow 2 of those, I try not to follow funny eyes people and those with hodl in their name, I'm possibly doing Nostr wrong?

Also deliberately stay to the as it happens feed, that's just my preference.

You can work with:

1. Diminishing returns: on followers counts, zaps, replies, ...

2. Looking at thread length in the replies as an indicator of real conversation beyond "GM, GM"

He says they're doing all of that, but it has little discernable effect.

Probably because the deviation/spread in follower count is so humungous.

Yeah, the onboarding of most apps doesn't really help either with that humongous difference.

I'm surprised looking at thread length wouldn't have an influence. That's the first crude algo I'd use to find actual conversation (like this one)

Well, length alone would strongly favor a GM post. Only measuring depth/width/nesting, would uncover interaction.

Yes! That's exactly what I mean with "length" (oops 🀦)

Oh, okay. I don't know, if they've taken this into account.

I was also thinking it'd be interesting to have a heat map that showed clusters of threads with active, lively interactions around the same topic, rather than only individual thread content.

More threads with a structure like

OP

A

B

C

A

B

D

A

C

D

E

Instead of with "GM structure"

OP

A

B

C

D

E

First one had indentations, to show nested replies. Sorry.

I'm not complaining I can't trend. I trend regularly. Here's the fastest way for me to trend:

Post a pretty picture of food.

Post a pretty nature picture.

Remind people to stack sats.

Post a selfie of my face, preferably without makeup or filters and facing the light.