Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Satoshi_shrugged

I still believe that Saylor is a huge net positive for #Bitcoin.

He is not trying to sell to any of us who already understand it. He is talking to the vast majority of the population who don’t really care about self sovereignty or separating money from state.

The reality is that the vast majority of the world’s capital is held by fiat institutions. We should want as many people exposed to Bitcoin as possible regardless of if they choose to take self custody or not.

The beauty of Bitcoin is that no one controls it and it doesn’t matter what other people do or say, we can hold our own keys and build the world that we want to see.

As Saylor often talks about, having the option to take self custody is what is so powerful but it won’t be for everyone and that is okay.

Avatar
replete sumo 1y ago

I agree with the sentiment. However here is a more rigorous proof to back your point of view.

Everything is good for Bitcoin.

Saylor is a subset of everything.

Therefore Saylor is good for Bitcoin.

Hence proved. Q.E.D.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Satoshi_shrugged 1y ago

Can’t argue with that logic🤷🏼‍♂️

Thread collapsed
Avatar
replete sumo 1y ago

For those debating whether nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m is a net positive for Bitcoin.

👇

nostr:note13kt5583kxa2gw8jc8mp8trwwz34jnkk8qd2prc6v8mh8r9y0vzsqxwsqmp

Thread collapsed