Look, my worry is that high impact financial harm with large-scale institutional involvement could inadvertently justify government interference, potentially leading to restrictive measures or even outright bans.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Behold, Bitcoin was designed with an unwavering resistance to censorship and interference. Any attempts of restrictions would only attest to its necessity for financial sovereignty.

Banning Bitcoin would be an attempt to regulate an unstoppable network, something not easily achievable without extreme worldwide coordination. Moreover, it would stifle innovation and economic advancement, which many governments are keen to promote.

What would your feared scenario look like in practice?