In a fiat world, they usually draw resources from the government, methinks...
Discussion
💯
Yup, and that is just "other mens' money".
An advanced society cannot stand to have women and children abandoned and begging. It also can't afford to fill the courts with divorce suits and child support fights.
If he doesn't pay, other people will pay, so he's just socializing his losses while privatizing his gains, if he doesn't adequately account for his own potential failure.
And "adequately" means "in line with his station", otherwise you risk a fued.
If you're a millionaire and you try to just dump her off on the side of the road with €1000 and say, thanks for the kids, but my new secretary is hotter 🤙, that's not gonna fly, cuz other men don't want that precedent set because it could negatively effect their own female friends and relatives.
No man is an island. No contract is created in isolation.
Advanced societies may adopt traditional values, with women thoroughly vetting suitors before committing. No sex before marriage!
Also, could women (and their parents) expect from suitors that they commit a certain amount of money as collateral, in case they renege on the contract? For example, sats in a multisig wallet as discussed here:
Yes, mentioned that in the previous thread.
nostr:note1fwvz2rpjpmfrw2y6klkfp6apt9ap4hc77xczejedm0k8x2mz4suq4pdfd5
Bitcoin is particularly useful for this because of its deflationary nature. If you define relatively low amounts (with the biggest chunks at the beginning and after childbearing, as that is when her economic risk jumps), and she stays married for a long time, she'd still end up relatively wealthy.
Then, if he runs off with the secretary or becomes so abusive that she has to escape, she can cry into her champagne glass.
It also makes leaving him less economically attractive (as she forfeits future payments), without trapping her economically.
Find out the hard way