"germ theory" is the target to be destroyed.
until that happens they will wash, rinse, repeat.
by saying it existed in europe before or whatever it was is to just spin wheels allowing their totalitarian-intended narrative to continue...
same with "lab leak" theory, etc etc...
viruses definitely "exist" and can be "purified" - that is, when you carry out certain procedures you make the observations you expect and which are fully consistent with them existing, which is the most one could ever say. I've done it myself.
the question is what effect they have, if any
WHICH VIRUS DID YOU ISOLATE?
lol lambda phage for one
no virus has ever been PHYSICALLY isolated.
you are a fool.
LMAO this is what the dude does to "purify" and "isolate" and since the authorities tell him it is isolation he believes it - a 100% authentic modern scientist.
#losing
I've physically isolated viruses in the terms she uses in that video. Shrugs. The most you could say is that it's not 100% pure because there are some contaminants.. ..like water / solvents.
But it's really not that important one way or another and that video is really just nitpicking terminology with reference to dictionary definitions. It doesn't relate to the more interesting question of what these entities do, if anything.
You can buy isolated covid out of a catalogue. This is not a big deal one way or another - because it doesn't mean it does what is attributed to it.
https://www.atcc.org/products/vr-3342hk
A lot of this seems to relate to not being able to "see" viruses. This is obviously ridiculous. You can't "see" alcohol, do you think that means it doesn't exist?
ok, so how exactly do you carry out the "purification" and "isolation" ?
something like take a supernatant from lysed cell culture (where virus has been infecting cells), and centrifuge the big stuff (or physically fractionate to get things if the size you are interested in)
what you get will be mainly protein particles with some sort of nucleic acid. you can then characterise both of those with a million techniques including sequencing, structure etc
the results you get are consistent with what a virus is supposed to be. what that actually means is a different question
bear in mind that most of human DNA is probably viral in origin by this definition. the whole thing is deep af and nobody really understands it. but pretending there's nothing there is kinda stupid
nostr:npub1ljxdldrq885zamfkn82k7zcjs4lrsf9wykrh9e3hq4thh89vlzxsr83h7d
to elaborate a bit, the "deeper stuff" is that really the lines we draw between organisms are really completely abstract, a human construct to help us simplify reality in a way we can get our heads around
when you actually consider objectively what "we" are, it includes more bacteria and bacterial genes than "human" ones - notably in the gut where they're part of our digestive system but also at a deeper level within our cells - as mitochondria seems clearly to be ancient bacteria that built a bunch of stuff around them.
from this perspective you can argue we are really just structures bacteria have built around themselves. plants too as chloroplasts are the same.
but not only that, the lines between individual bacteria are very blurred. I think where you get to is the whole thing is one big network of genes without any deep distinction between one part and another.
viruses come in as shuttles for genes - packets on the network if you like
all of which leads to the even deeper question of what "I" am and how I connect to this network. but I'll leave that for now!
