Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Derek Ross

Charging $1 a year to Tweet and Retweet may not seem like a lot, however optics matter. It sets the stage to charge more in the future, it makes the service no longer free, and most importantly, it makes Twitter no longer the public square where anyone is able to freely talk - a point in which Elon likes to state, but continues to erode.

While on the NOSTR we happily Zap developers more than $1 worth of sats quite often and some could agree that it's a similar task to paying a measily 4000 sats, it's not. It's not a requirement. It's not forced. The NOSTR is completely free and open. The openness is the difference. The NOSTR is the public square.

https://fortune.com/2023/10/17/twitter-x-charging-new-users-1-dollar-year-to-tweet/

51
516add19... 2y ago

Was Twitter ever free or are their users the product being sold?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
SMS 2y ago

Having sold users products though, gallows

🥁

Thread collapsed
Avatar
Derek Ross 2y ago

Right. If you want to get into semantics here, your data was the product and that came at a personal cost. I'm specifically talking about monetary cost here.

51
516add19... 2y ago

I see your point. 🤙

Avatar
SMS 2y ago

Yeah, totally. It’s cool to watch. Not really a new feature, but looking to upgrayedd

https://youtube.com/shorts/4gJfko54sPY?si=qcigXZUa_eeFkOeq

Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed