Statecoins are essentially e-Cash tokens; haven't thought about it that way yet. Interesting

Makes sense though. Both are a way to move an underlying coin off-chain

Cc @calle

👇

Bitcoin.Review Podcast with NVK & Guests: BR030 - Mercury Wallet, BitKey, BDK, Mutiny Wallet + MORE ft. Nicholas Gregory, Rijndael & Odell

https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/bitcoinreview/episodes/BR030---Mercury-Wallet--BitKey---BDK--Mutiny-Wallet--MORE-ft--Nicholas-Gregory--Rijndael--Odell-e21t8ft

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Now that they're blind-signed in mercury, it's getting close to ecash but it's been a while since I looked. Unfortunately you can't split them, otherwise they would be insanely useful.

This. Yes.

Getting more and more the feeling that LN was a bit of a time waster, and that creating virtual representation of BTC utxo («Token». eg cashu, statecoin etc) & and passing them around off chain is this actual solution for the internet payment use case. Not as decentralized, not as trust minimized, not as technically fancy as LN - but simple, reliable, and absolutely superior UX

Payment channels would have evolved naturally anyway, as a way for mints to settle amongst them. But it's not sth for regular user wallets.