With open, decentralized, permissionless networks & protocols there is no 'official' anything.

- I often see debate on how or what to call things, for example, 'sats' & what symbol we should use to identify it with.

- Reality is there is no 'right or wrong' terminology or symbolic denotation that can be used as long as the general concept is able to be communicated.

- This is because protocols like Nostr & networks like Bitcoin don't have founders, CEOs, leaders, etc...

- It simply has culture & we all know that the only constant with culture is that it is forever changing.

- With changing culture we see the arise of 'slang' that gets formed around a concept, an example being people commonly using a term like a 'buck' or a 'bill' to describe a US Dollar.

- This will be no different moving forward in the words we come to accept to use to describe terminologies & symbols around Bitcoin & Nostr.

- We've already seen the term 'corn' grow into a commonly used word to describe Bitcoin. Could many someday use the word 'Zap' to communicate the concept of a 'sat'? Could the lightning bolt emoji come to replace any of the existing symbols for a Satoshi? Could the use of the virtually universal Bitcoin logo ever get replaced someday (Blasphemy! hahaha)?

- Only time will tell but that's ultimately up to a 'cultural consensus' that forms around these protocols & networks to decide, not specific individuals who wish to impose enforcement.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Well put. There’s no standard but consensus which still allows smaller communities live their own truth.

Yeah, exactly. In Zimbabwe they might call em Zaps & in Europe they might call em sats. There's no universal anything really, like you said, smaller communities will end up forming their own communication consensuses as well.

tl;dr - if someone tells you there's a certain way something must be called or a certain symbol that must be used to describe anything about Bitcoin or Nostr, tell em to GFY. 😉