You don’t have to specify ahead of time; you can add people as you go, and anyone can permissionlessly edit whatever they want, this is just a scheme to say “whatever these pubkeys say is as good as if I had said it”
Discussion
Ghost-writing wiki pages seems influencery and intransparent and precludes debate. The hurdle to remove a change you've merged is higher than just ignoring it or discussing before you merge.
Changed my mind. Don't like.
Too consensus-y/commie.
But I can just ignore this feature, if you add it, so.... 🤷♀️
fuck consensus, let's have the whole shebang
If you add this feature, then I can market myself as someone who doesn't use it. 😂
Laeserin, edgy and real.
I said. What I said.
These words are all mine.
The buck stops here.
Loving the feature, already. 😂
It would still be more effective to point to specific entries rather than to trusted pubkeys.
Then you follow the chain of pointers to get to the entry that everyone in the chain has helped refine and agrees is the best
that's what is already defined in the NIP under "defer"
I guess this is definitive proof that I'm a bit retarded
🤔 
It works for me
what browser are you using?
