Then don’t but you haven’t offered any convincing reason why I should trust your opinion
Discussion
If you say so. Keep in mind that you're choosijg to trust the man who voluntarily caused egregious levels of existential damage to society. All done under the order of the state. Putting your faith in the guy who gave the okay for all that carnage to commence is like putting your faith back into banks to handle your accounts responsibly.
“Voluntarily caused egregious levels of existential damage to society. “
“All done under the order of the state.”
Do you know what an oxymoron is?
I do. My mistake. But, you understand what I was getting at, right?
No I don’t. That’s an oxymoron. How can Jack voluntarily hurt society under the order of the state? State orders are always backed by a gun. That means it’s not voluntary.
That's why I said it was my mistake. It wasn't voluntary but he could've stopped whenever he wanted.
How can you stop if it’s not voluntary?
You pack the hell up and leave. He had the resources necessary, I don't doubt.
So he quits the company he started and then the shareholders put in a new CEO that will do the same thing. What did he accomplish?
The avoidance of accountability over the negative consequences of his decisions.
He’s donated millions trying to build a system that fixes the problem he faced on Twitter and you’re talking about accountability? Why are you even on nostr if it’s so horrible?
Yes, I am. And because the people I interact aren't horrible and nostr isn't just about decentralized socials🙄. Duhhh!
One question: so, you don't want to start a private simplex chat?
No we can talk perfectly fine here
Yes, for his own purposes that don't have anything to do with the best of nostr. Why in the world do you think he's a good dude now?
“Donated millions,” from a billionaire, who made their money as a Fed.
You really are retarded.