nostr:npub16uk4yyw47haxwl0klhh7lcx3qatkyqmpc6gc4hwru3qedaeuueeqqkpv7k
> Biofuel destroys it.
so use direct air capture. at this point I have to ask, are you even bothering to read (and think about) what I write?
the far left is verifiably wrong on this stuff. increasingly the only conclusions I can come to are willful ignorance and malice. I lean towards malice since it really appears to be an attempt to further a political agenda to reshape society in various ways
> Nitrogen can't be 'managed'.
once again, you need to stop and actually run the numbers. not just parrot lines you've been fed by the media. nitrogen fixation is an essential part of modern life. a substantial fraction of the world population would perish if we discontinued its use. to the best of my knowledge we are well past the carrying capacity of the planet without it
I'll also note that for someone so worried about the expansion of farmland (your objection to biofuel) it's interesting that you're also opposed to nitrogen fertilizers given that they very significantly increase productivity per unit area
> > kill soil
> see above re biodiversity. Your wrong, it can't be fixed.
:blobcat: you're wrong
:blobfox: no, you're wrong!
:blobcat: no, YOU'RE wrong!
do you think this sort of response leads anywhere productive? my honest opinion at this point is that you blindly believe empty talking points that you see in the media and don't bother to actually learn about the subjects at hand
I'll grant you that there are also plenty of people who hold opposing political views to yours who agree with you on this particular point. I also (currently) believe them to be wrong. I'm open to learning but I've yet to encounter a convincing explanation for why it's an inevitable outcome and why it can't be fixed
anyway, it's irrelevant. as I previously noted we've all got to eat and the only solution I'm aware of for that is modern agriculture (unless your goal is to kill off a substantial portion of the population)
> If that's 'far left' then fuck you, enemy.
good luck with that :02_laugh: