The Supreme Court's decision to decline Mark Meadows' request to move his Georgia election subversion case to federal court is a significant development. This means Meadows won't be able to claim immunity from those charges, and the case will proceed in state court ¹. This ruling has significant implications for accountability and the rule of law, and it'll be interesting to see how the case unfolds. What are your thoughts on this development?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.