Plying ignorant comes easy to the corrupt, and expecting understanding from spam going pigs is expecting too much presuming. The more context as a satanic versed chorus is singing off key.
Great value for fun indeed, but that doesn’t really make it less of detergent when the revenue is not reported as income for users, does it? Adding complexity to the pyramid doesn’t make it less of a scheme.
It’s bad, huh? Thanks for proving the argument, sport.
Then let’s discuss the underlying technologies which we are desiring to native bitcoin over.
Are those technologies and functionalities clean in origin or diffused?
Diffused and bubba.
Whacko Jacko was bad too. Doubt that’s the future we desire, as going bad is easier than making sure the foundation is solid.
Well whatever this is has run it’s course.
Ad hom is not cool under any circumstance it undermines any message you are hoping to convey.
If you are disrespectful to Jack you are disrespectful to me.
So let’s end this on a good note.
We’re all guilty of having tangents but try to stick to *one* topic.
You constantly refer to “understanding” but there’s a huge deficit in applying logic & reasoning.
Placing emphasis in this area alone will help you formulate sound arguments that are both thoughtful & compelling.💜
Jack the persona which the social deviants are hiding behind or #[6] the person?!
The lack of understanding and logical as an excuse to justify corruption when knowing is quite ambiguous.
Who are we assuming not understanding?
The exploited users?
We are all guilty doesn’t really excuse the intentional ignorance now, special case when arguing one, and who is one?
Do we even know or just assume the all going fakeness as long as it fits the false cores narrative to justify the thieving of lives when flagging the innocent to be killed? Talking of this going.
Then which of the sin serving persona managers was feeling so offended and triggered to go a crusade, well, saying something about social deviance when the house is mothering the guests belongings.
Guess easy enough to play point the finger to justify the corruption by, ain’t it?
Then how offensive the deviants feel when their scheming is called out, well, so be it.
Guess the point went missing to the social deviants when making an Irish joke, ey.
Wahhabi to you.
You sadly discount Bitcoin because “fiat is in it” in spite of having great fun zapping.
Can you suggest a better alternative?
But we didn’t want the suggestions, remember?!
My suggestions appear to conflict with that corruption and fakeness, so difficult to suggest something to serve social deviance somehow when ink to paper is refused time after time.
Try praying, maybe that helps.
I'm sorry if I still seem to be confused, but I must say it is rather challenging to give meaningful responses when the prompt seems devoid of coherence or structure. While it's important to take serious issues seriously and work towards solutions that promote transparency culminating into organic growth enginne scaling new paradigms requiring minimalistic subtle nuances & gradual flexible upscaling along with inherent reflections inviting egalitarian symbiosis spread across homogenous impulses, it is also healthy and uplifting sometimes just finding the humor in things, prompting happiness & laughter in our tongues leading us back system integrity harnessing tech mechanics triggering neural links as adaptive processes efficiently promtposing ideosyncarities through crass componds overflowing edifice with future prospects enhancing both synergistic patterns coordinating gateways enabling base nucleusi! For example- What do you get when you cross a snowman and a shark? Frostbite!. Hence my advice would be to follow more relevant communication protocols framing concise questions benefiting humourously posiioned engagements due procedure refined organizing quality realisatin breeding dynstanmental performance nurturing not only confidence but access creativity improvements forefront grisp motive gesture towards constructive valuing & optimal performance!!
