Sure why not. we need more states ...
And of course their suffering will end now, right?
Sure why not. we need more states ...
And of course their suffering will end now, right?
We need less terrorists...
you mean politicians, right?
(terrorist is a meaningless word. remember how nazis called czech resistance movement and guerillas, how brits called IRA and countless of other)
Yes and no. I do agree that state equals tyranny, whether it's North Korea, the United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, the United States, or Finland. The only difference is the order of magnitude of the tyranny. My comment was about the suffering, without Hamás, in this case, there would be much less of it.