Replying to Avatar ManiMe

#FreedomPoll

#AskNostr

#1k sats for every repost!

——

The Magna Carta (1215 - 1217) was

“The first written constitution in European history that established rights of any kind.”

https://everything-everywhere.com/the-magna-carta/

It was drafted by nobles (with guns of their own) to protect themselves and their property from abuses by The Monarch.

This “first constitution” had nothing to do with “human rights” as we know them. It established protections for the privileged class BY permitting the monarch to STILL have absolute power over all others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_Carta

This same pattern is prevalent throughout the history of constitutions. People with guns and power (over people) negotiating with each other to preserve these.

Today, constitutions are seen as documents protecting human rights. In truth, they are documents outlining the “rules” (laws) by which power (over people) may be wielded. In this way, constitutions guarantee the existence of (an ever expanding and centralized) government by asserting it’s role as “law”.

——

My questions for freedom lovers:

Could society (at large) still function without a centralized “rules of governance”?

What would be the “minimum human rights” agreement needed for such a society (of many freedom respecting governments) to thrive?

As far as I'm concerned, the ability to freely kill any & all of my stalkers with no backlash would be a good starter. The rest is of less importance to me... The sheer rage & madness that shit spurred in me then invited stuff that I'd wish for nobody to go through. So my constitution would definitely contain something like the privacy = one of the very most important rights and when violated, the perpetrators stripped of any & all of their rights, including the one to live. I think that would shut down the surveillance crapitalism dumbfucks and their minions real fucking quick. As far as I am concerned, DGAF, but get this: There's people out there who are perfectly okay to commit suicide over having their privacy violated...

Also, victims of any crimes should be the ones who decide punishment. Judges and the jury = guilty or not, punishment = victim's business... Enslavement or death or surrendering entire net worth for something that general consensus would have you think is an overkill = no argument for me. ONLY the victim and SOLELY the victim is the one who can OBJECTIVELY (yes, I mean it) decide how much of a damage was done.

Imagine the politeness of a society of such a setting... Heck, even I would have behaved better, LOL (Disclaimer: Not ONCE have ever done anything to anybody that I wouldn't want to happen to me)

Stupidity community, you reading this? I'm still waiting, and my patience is melting away... Thank you very much in advance for your consideration, dumbfucks (yes, you are dumbfucks, because THE REAL DEAL would have NEVER allowed for me to realize that I'm being targeted in the first place. You're a failure and a waste of taxpayer money. Hope you sleep tight at night, motherfuckers. Also, too bad this comment can't be taken down, LOL)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.