nostr:npub1re9rqyj2zgzyrn0hd4zj9rttmfeatu9akyn3ctvqz64q3ksy0casga7c03

Who called it "work?"

The only time I mentioned work referenced my path through the day.

I like having a routine that lets me enjoy what I'm doing with the least amount of friction.

My morning affirmation for the day ahead feels off when it's not the first step I take. This is a recent change to my routine that - on reflection - isn't working for me.

I feel the need to re-align my daily practice so it flows better.

Thanks for clarifying your intent.

I suppose what I was getting at when you said “it works” when you described the task as clearing.

From personal experience I have found that this seemed like an accomplishment of “clearing” but on reflection I was having trouble with assessing that after the fact, especially after having done managed RSS for some time.

I was wondering if your task of clearing you had some tool to extract or harvest something useful while you were engaged in the clearing.

For me the “bounty” perceived of setting up an automatically gathered and curated RSS feed that greeted me when I opened up the reeder on sober assessment was false.

There might be some way to regurgitate from consuming such a feed but the product of such activity seemed illusionary and just added to the general noise.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nostr:npub1re9rqyj2zgzyrn0hd4zj9rttmfeatu9akyn3ctvqz64q3ksy0casga7c03

Mostly I scan the headlines and mark them read. Actual news sources are the least interesting. I skim the international ones for clues about what might be happening elsewhere.

Some individuals I follow often have interesting ideas. Especially as it relates to writing and reading. I might read more than the first paragraph.

Sources that never offer thought-fodder get purged.

The whole process takes less than 15 minutes.

Right.

For me the loss of time is not the issue - chirp chirp - it is the clouding (pun intended) of the mind.