Dubay got me started on this subject; no way is the official narrative accurate. There are far too many logical problems with everything we were taught to believe.
The Flat Earth Society is controlled op and the wrong place to look. Its sole aim is to push content nobody believes so that nasa/gov simps can mock the premise that earth is no spinning ball while having their heads way up Musk's ass.
Here a good place for the curious to start breaking their programming:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/100ProofsEarthisNotaGlobeVideobook:f
Discussion
can you cite a few?
I mean, related to the flat Earth. I already know many about all the other topics 🙂
There are constraints as to what we can individually prove ourselves. I cannot say with absolute certainty that it’s flat, but I am quite sure it’s not an “oblate sphere” hurtling through space.
The 3 probes sent to the Lagrange points over the past 3 decades all provided the same data, dubbed the axis of evil, that shows us that Earth is in the middle of everything. They explain it away by coming up with nonsense ala “dark matter”.
Red and blue shift, we only ever see red shift.
There is no exclusive evidence that the earth orbits the sun.
According to the Science, the universe is expanding at 4x the speed of light. Yet the speed of light is supposed to be the fastest constant we have. How do they explain this? By interchanging general and special relativity whenever it suits them.
Relativity and the Lorentz contraction were just the next in line to explain away the failed Michelson-Morley experiment. Imagine believing objects are physically contracting in the direction of motion, but if you’re moving in the same direction you cannot perceive this contraction because it’s all relative. To believe this, that means you have to believe solid physical objects are coincidentally contracting to make them appear the same. It’s just an illusion, they claim. Or, it’s what we observe and their theories are bullshit.
All these convoluted theories to explain their negative results over and over, when the simpler and more logical answers appear to be something many won’t entertain.
Inevitably someone will ask "Why lie about this?"
If I tell you that you are an insignificant lifeform on an insignificant planet in an insignificant part of the universe and that there is no creator of your world, but the pseudo-scientific "Life appearing out of non-life", the highest authority in your mind would be me.
After I've programmed you thusly I am free to tell you any nonsense which would benefit me at your expense, and you wouldn't even think to question it. Mind enslavement. Hiding the true earth is playing god.
We're not being told the whole truth, that's given. 'Flat' claim is just silly, though.
I'm not sure about the validity of this point. If I convince you that you've been created by a god and that I represent that god, I become your master. Just look at the power that this mechanism gave to few men in the whole human history.
Whatever con, it's always about you trusting people as your highest authority. Both scenarios ask of you to believe in institutions of men. This is the point.
the speed of light is the speed limit in space. The space itself can expand at whatever the speed it want.
relativity is strange (including distortion of bodies moving) but it make sense. It forecasted many phenomenons before we observed them (and this makes of it a good theory).
I have not a physic background, but I have studied it by myself. To the extend I can understand it, works well.