It's still obvious that these inputs are corresponding to these outputs no ? I mean, it's more or less 570 BTC on both side, looks like a weak privacy gain. Anyway i would not be satisfied if it were mine....
Discussion
It's privacy theater all while asking permission and funding chain analysis. Absolute trash.
How is a cj funding chain anal?
Wasabi submits input utxos to surveillance firms before CJ rounds, and pays them for this “service”
Wasabi coinjoins fund chain anal. If you use Wasabi's coinjoin implementation with the default coordinator you are not only subjecting your UTXO's history to a dispicable voodoo surveillance company you are also funding them.
I still don't know how anyone who uses or promotes Wasabi justifies this. Good on BTCSessions for dropping them as a sponsor of his shows when this announcement came out.
Are there other coordinators ?
Not that I know of. The problem with different coordinators is then it's a completely different tiny liquidity pool. Different coordinators, different pools.
Samouraï Whirlpool is going to release a « different coordinators but same pool project », it’s going to be interesting to see how it works
Didn't know this was wasabi 👍
For extremely large amounts, larger than other users contribute combined, Wasabi has to break down your amounts into smaller amounts that actually can be mixed. In that process Wasabi wallet correctly tells you that you haven't yet achieved meaningful privacy.
For smaller users, Wasabi can much more easily achieve meaningful privacy because other users have contributed more funds to the coinjoin than you have.