How accurate is this?
Discussion
Does it become more or less accurate with someone pointing it out?
Does water become less wet just because we drown someone in it?
We can fool some people sometimes, but we can’t fool all the people all the time, since self deception is nonetheless deception.
Then go blaming me for water being wet, tell me, does it reduce our margins of error?
But hey, not to offend the ruling class, instead of accepting water being wet, we go demanding everybody not to believe water is wet because logical reasoning is offensive. Like slapping on a pair of fake tits pretending being a mother and then changing what makes a woman not offend the great pretender.
Sure, we can all agree that water is dry and the deserts wet, but that doesn’t solve us having drowned a man nor bring him back, does it?
Those margins of error?
Does drowning me now make a difference to the facts and flaws in reasoning?
Offensive ain’t it?
Let’s demand an apology from you not to offend our pride.
#[5]
We drowned the guy goes you honor, the witness goes. He was offering our flawed understanding.
The judge be like, what now? Is that a confession or justification?
It's accurate to the degree that the relays I'm checking (about half a dozen of the biggest for the moment) have list events for the given user.
All the list kinds (NIP-51) are replaceable events, so I'm getting all the list events I can from all the relays, then sorting them by created date and referencing only the most recently created.
It's possible (probable, some might say) that I'm missing the most recent list for a given user because it's on a different relay. But as NDK get's better with relay discovery, and I start to implement relay discovery myself this sort of error should go to near zero.