I listended to Preston Pysh's podcast about the threat of quantum computing and I'm wondering why more people aren't talking about it?
Discussion
Talking about what? The projected narrative of the threat? or the fact that Bitcoin disproves their models?
The threat is convincing your Bitcoin and cryptography is broken without proof beyond a falsifiable theory.
I tend to concur. I watched the podcast and, no shade to nostr:nprofile1qqsg2zqd8wkhpnxu6lm5c2dyfa2mhpwte57apjae2ldp6g2mmwf3ypqpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7q2hwaehxw309anxjmr5v4ezumn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tmwwp6kyvtnx4uhzdnhv9j8wuncv3jngmrgveen2dn8dcmrg6rh0f6ksmnxvym8ywtddg6rwdnjx4eng6rtw4h85em6w9e8xdn3xaaquwrzjs, of course, but it bummed me out. This is a particularly nasty FUD that's really hard to grok and defend against. Most people talking about it are sincere. Who dares to question the high priests of theoretical physics? The fiat hype machine invested in it has a ton of firepower. Companies spend massively on building quantum resistance, which is mostly theater: "it's ready to turn on." They get moat and privileged market access. Meanwhile, if it's all smoke--and it defies first principles reasoning, as you say--then precious cryptography and engineering resources are being burnt on an altar fraud. And Bitcoin gets FUDed and potentially distracted and deformed in the process. We have to find the right balance of messaging and pragmatic readiness to navigate this somehow, without wasting too much time or damaging the network OR getting gated out.