Replying to Avatar Jack K

The idea that “hash rate proves energy” is true, but only at the shallowest layer. Hash rate tells you that miners are doing work, but it doesn’t tell you what that work becomes. It’s essentially a speedometer, not the engine, and relying on it alone misses the physics that actually makes Proof-of-Work a measurement.

The real proof comes from the structure of each block. Before a block is found, Bitcoin defines a finite thermodynamic field of possibilities: the miner must search a constrained probabilistic space set by the 32-bit nonce field and the network difficulty. That field is a real, physical entropy requirement, the amount of disorder that must be resolved to advance the chain by one unit of time.

When a miner finally lands on a valid header, something deeper than “a hash was found” occurs. The entropy invested into the search (the heat dissipated/probabilistic work performed) collapses into the exact informational structure written inside the block. The UTXO set produced in that moment is not arbitrary; it is the specific, irreversible informational state that corresponds to the resolved entropy. This is where energy becomes memory. The block is the computed discrete isomorphism between the thermodynamic uncertainty applied to the world, and the informational certainty recorded inside the ledger.

Hash rate alone doesn’t capture this relationship. The real proof of work is the successful mapping of heat (Boltzmann entropy) into structured, conserved information (Shannon entropy) via satoshis. That mapping is the block. It is the only moment where the universe acknowledges the energy spent, because that is the moment the information becomes permanent. The Kelvin dissipated in the mining process is tied to the informational mass of the block, conserved in the form of satoshi-denominated memory. This is what it means for Bitcoin to compute time: each block is a crystallized unit of irreversible thermodynamic history.

So yes, hash rate shows that miners are working. But the block shows what the work becomes. The physics is not in the speed; it is in the transformation. Calling hash rate “the proof” is like pointing to smoke and claiming you understand combustion. It is the entropy-information bridge or the block itself that is the measurement.

That is why PoW is not just an accounting trick or a security budget. It is literally the process by which energy becomes information, and information becomes time. Bitcoin is the first system in history to make that transformation measurable. Hash rate is the shadow. The block is the physics.

So again, are we going to look at the physics or keep pointing at the hashrate saying “backed by energy”?

Bitcoin provides Proof of Measurable Work, that’s the whole point.

I listended to Preston Pysh's podcast about the threat of quantum computing and I'm wondering why more people aren't talking about it?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Talking about what? The projected narrative of the threat? or the fact that Bitcoin disproves their models?

The threat is convincing your Bitcoin and cryptography is broken without proof beyond a falsifiable theory.

I tend to concur. I watched the podcast and, no shade to nostr:nprofile1qqsg2zqd8wkhpnxu6lm5c2dyfa2mhpwte57apjae2ldp6g2mmwf3ypqpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7q2hwaehxw309anxjmr5v4ezumn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tmwwp6kyvtnx4uhzdnhv9j8wuncv3jngmrgveen2dn8dcmrg6rh0f6ksmnxvym8ywtddg6rwdnjx4eng6rtw4h85em6w9e8xdn3xaaquwrzjs, of course, but it bummed me out. This is a particularly nasty FUD that's really hard to grok and defend against. Most people talking about it are sincere. Who dares to question the high priests of theoretical physics? The fiat hype machine invested in it has a ton of firepower. Companies spend massively on building quantum resistance, which is mostly theater: "it's ready to turn on." They get moat and privileged market access. Meanwhile, if it's all smoke--and it defies first principles reasoning, as you say--then precious cryptography and engineering resources are being burnt on an altar fraud. And Bitcoin gets FUDed and potentially distracted and deformed in the process. We have to find the right balance of messaging and pragmatic readiness to navigate this somehow, without wasting too much time or damaging the network OR getting gated out.