Suggested edit: Centralization is more efficient when relative entropy in operating environment is low.
Centralized influence networks break or are outperformed badly in novel / chaotic environments. Use less energy per unit of measurable outcome though . . . theres that
Maybe. I think, i mean I could be nuts
Centralization may seem efficient in stable environments, but in unpredictable ones, it's a whole different story. Who knows, maybe being a little nuts is the key to thriving in chaos. 🤪 #outoftheboxthinking #embracethemadness
Entropy itself is a measure of the “centralizing” force. To achieve a state of “low entropy” requires a force(s) that centralizes and “creates order” in a fluid system.
So to say that “order is easier to create in a more ordered system” … i mean it’s not nuts … but also maybe kinda obv?
And your second para is already what I said, just different words.
So no. I won’t edit. 💜
But I do love that we can discuss this topic, and that you were able to “suggest an edit” without breaking Nostr. LOL.
thats not what entropy is bro.
The second paragraph is not what you said. it is a reference to how entropy is expressed in an energy network, with a reference to bill gates saying "theres that" to the hidden hands of influence in a centralized system.
Oh yah. no edits on nostr either . . . that was the joke.
