Not sure that formalizing the market would add much to what we already have. Prediction markets are useful for things where its not already possible to "put your money where your mouth is". But we already have that in OSS via developers investing their time, users choosing which software to run, etc.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Can I put my money on the success of all the open-source projects I think are going to succeed? Can I bet on their failure?

That would require some sort of hard and tamper proof metric to measure success or failure.

Is it as straightforward as placing a bet? No. But there are still many more/better ways to do it than, say, going long or short the outcome of an election. Prediction markets shine in contexts like elections because there aren't other good skin-in-the-game metrics. But OSS has things like developer activity, user adoption, $ donations, etc.

Also: how do you measure success? Elections are easier.

Good point. Linux never has conquered the desktop (unless you count WSL), yet more people use it every day than anyone ever imagined.

Investing your own time in an open-source project is not very different from voting in an election and promoting your candidate and so on. Both kinds of actions give us no clue to whether the project or candidate is going to be successful or not.