Well, I can see your point. But I always go back to basics—first principles. I’ve studied enough to understand the purpose behind things, not just the structures.

Studying common law, saving in Bitcoin, and studying Austrian economics are guiding me by simple principles and virtues. They support my willingness to contribute to an open-market civilization. I don’t have the need to wait or wish for government systems to evolve. My purpose is to stay in alignment—not to ask for permission.

That said, I still believe that understanding the kind of government we have should be a priority—for both kids and adults. If people don’t know what we were meant to be, they’ll never notice how far we’ve drifted.

So sure—test ideas, experiment with governance models. But for me, it’s about embodying my freedom, not designing better cages.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Absolutely and I don’t see both approaches as incompatible even if they can be in conflict. There will always be free markets and there will always be a structure of governance. I like the idea of having no government or rather governance but, it won’t happen because the void will always be filled by some sort of governance hence, it’s important that we have the best governance possible but not everybody is interested in taking part in the process and that’s totally fine.

Great point and lovely conversation thank you