I mean it is L-BTC but still self custody, no?
Discussion
Yeah, it's not a lie to refer to self-custody of Bitcoin IOU's as 'self-custody'. If anything, it's the "Bitcoin-only" claim that's the lie.
They specifically say multi-network capability: Bitcoin, lightning and liquid.
Yes.. AND they specifically said "Bitcoin-only". Make of that contradiction what you will. 🤷
So is nostr:nprofile1qqsrf5h4ya83jk8u6t9jgc76h6kalz3plp9vusjpm2ygqgalqhxgp9gpzfmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82cspr9mhxue69uhhxetwv35hgtnwdaekvmrpwfjjucm0d59vq0t7 with cashu support bitcoin only wallet or no?
No.
Let me put it this way: a self-custodial, liquid-only wallet is not a "self-custodial, Bitcoin-only wallet". A self-custodial, cashu-only wallet is not a "self-custodial, Bitcoin-only wallet". Adding a separate self-custodial Bitcoin wallet to either of these would not change the fact that they are not "self-custodial, Bitcoin-only". They would still be self-custodial, however. If a wallet is self-custodial; but, it is not "a self-custodial, Bitcoin-only wallet", that must mean it's not "Bitcoin-only".
OK, your definition is clear. And of course, we need a clear definition.
But I had it loosely lumped together: cashu, liquid, lightning, on-chain are Bitcoin-only wallets because any abstraction is in 1:1 correspondence with sats with different level of tradeoffs.
That's totally fair.
I don't think anyone who has a good idea what liquid is is going to be confused - which is why I included the qualifier "If anything.... " in my original post. But, if I were someone who had no idea what liquid was - and I was excited to try out this new "Bitcoin-only" wallet - once I did, I might feel like I was intentionally given a false impression what to expect.