So you agree that there is an objective reality and as such objective, but not necessarily universal, truths exist.

Would you disagree with the view that we interpret these truths individually, to a greater or lesser accuracy, and some people have more accurate interpretations of these truths, neither perfect nor complete? Some perspectives have proven long lasting and exist beyond the original viewer due to a greater accuracy to some truth of the universe? (Example: Einsteins General and Special Relativity)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Also the opposite still occurs.

The perspectives that continue after the observer is dead with no factual basis IE old wives tales, the lochness monster, holiday fables, religion.

However, it's currently a new world where cognitive and confirmation bias run rampant. All it takes is one person with a big reach to spread inaccuracies that eventually become solid fact to a rapidly expanding population.

Then there's the issue of fairness -- why are some inaccuracies held in high regard and others not, especially, when the validity of the claims are equally absurd?

nostr:nevent1qqsfp4xawthrppkx0hwndd8wy23yqlr50r8m5qkvptddff4fwv6uxpcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyqx3m4t2uvsyx28ytautrfj2ercx6gn398mh2jf7h6zv72p9p50vvqcyqqqqqqggrdlms