Why is it considered hate speech when I express my disinterest in being associated with lesbians as a member of the same group, but not when it’s the other way around? How do we define “hate” in a legal context? Do individuals genuinely comprehend the legal definition of “hate” when they passionately discuss hate speech and hate crimes?

I believe the concept of “hate crime” and “hate speech” emerged to safeguard potential victims of violence who lack the means to protect themselves. These victims often belong to minority groups because they have limited resources to represent their political interests in the Congress system. Advocacy groups emerged to assist them because, as minorities, they are often perceived as vulnerable.

However, if we examine how this principle has been exploited by various individuals for different purposes, it becomes evident that it may be time for everyone to reconsider this principle, which we adopted to protect marginalized individuals in society.

Laws are subject to change as society evolves. Rules and regulations are fluid and adaptable, allowing us to respond effectively to various social changes. This flexibility enables us to collectively survive and thrive. If you embrace this flexibility, you must also recognize that it benefits individuals you dislike as well. This is the essence of democracy. Legislation is not a mere joke; rules are rules that apply to everyone living in the same country or society. You cannot create new laws solely to benefit yourself and your associates.