From your content and videos I have seen you look pretty smart, but here you are missing something in my opinion.
What about those:
1. That cannot have children
2. Gay/Lesbian that don’t want to adopt
3. That haven’t found their life partner yet.
4. Etc.
You seem to imply that if you do not have children you don’t have anything to contribute to this world. It seems to me you haven’t thought this through. Be humble and try again?
You go too far. He simply said they shouldn't lead a nation (I happen to agree). He did not say they have nothing to co tribute to the world.
I remember how my world view changed when I had kids. All of a sudden I valued clean streets, safe neighborhoods, strong educational institutions, the 2nd amendment, self reliance, autonomy and the importance of freedom and the rights of my fellow man. I now value these things in ways that wouldn't clicked without children.
Before kids, these things were all just words.
I appreciated your perspective, this is why I like NOSTR.
nostr:nprofile1qqsyynyz05g96luvamf9marxkvxq00un34l3jdl8wjdlagspeyyf5ws6m5g3a did not elaborate much, short statements without too much context leave a lot of room for interpretation.
It is well known that world views change upon getting children and that is great in my opinion. However to dismiss people from leading nations without having any children and suggesting that those without children "Live and guide towards a future of what (probably your ego)" in my opinion is very short sighted.
What about Queen Elizabeth I of England (1533-1603), she is widely considered the most famous childless ruler in history. Known as the "Virgin Queen,"
Off with her head!
now i know how *u* sound micah-radio*/* n_n *_*
wen talking i mean
Did you listen to my radio show?
yes & enjoyed it micah
all of the show w/preview of local bandz++ the site sayz i need to dnld DRM fpr sum but i will use VLC or _
