I find it extremely funny how a few individuals try to decide how others should use Bitcoin.
Discussion
The irony is that a few individuals charged with spearheading freedom through decentralization (i.e. Bitcoin Core) seek to undermine it by mandating how others use their personal Bitcoin nodes; i.e. removing their OP_Return limit options.
In essence, Core is mulcting Bitcoin nodes as game theory or indirect pressure to centralize, control, and destroy Bitcoin which happens to be the only bulwark between you and a totalitarian state.
Bitcoin blockchain bloat is a shelling point for centralization and control.
The real irony is Bitcoin Core falling victim to Control Paradox.
You clearly still haven’t understood that the limit should be removed because it is completely irrelevant! It has always been possible to mine arbitrarily large transactions directly or to send them to a miner. So the limit is completely pointless since it has no effect.
And the argument that the blockchain gets bloated is also nonsense, because you can simply prune the data.
Imagine I’m Tom Cruise and you’re Jack Nicholson in the movie “A Few Good Men” (1992).
I proceed to ask you a simple question while you’re under oath as follows:
“If the OP_RETURN spam limit is as irrelevant as you say then why has Core risked all their political capital and the potential ossification of Bitcoin to have it removed?”
