I saw this post on nostr:npub1au23c73cpaq2whtazjf6cdrmvam6nkd4lg928nwmgl78374kn29sq9t53j ‘s feed and it resonated with me.

I know that individual devs don’t represent or speak for core. But I can’t help but feel uneasy when folks like Rusty Russell, representing themselves as a core dev, are excitedly talking up all the risky changes they’re planning while acknowledging their carefree approach to risk assessment. I have no idea whether the work is R&D or whether the soft fork is imminent.

What else is making people uneasy with core? Why is the perception of core getting worse?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.