Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

Both taxes and money-printing redistribute capital, but the difference is that money-printing does it less transparently.

With money-printing, the effect works behind the scenes in ways that are harder to quantify. That's why when a government can't find a solution between hard spending choices, they print money. It's the easier method.

People know their personal tax rate, they will riot if their taxes are too high, and they know exactly who is responsible for tax levels.

But inflation is a more complex beast. It comes with a lag, for starters, since it takes time for printed money to work its way through the system. And when it comes, propaganda built on grains of truth is effective at making it unclear to people who is responsible. "It's the greedy corporations that are responsible for raising prices, not the fact that we increased the money supply 40% over the past two years!"

And so money-printing effects people not directly based on their income, their need, or other things, but based on their level of awareness of what's happening. It rewards people who are aware of it, and are borrowing the devalued currency, owning scarcer assets, and denominating contracts in harder currency. It harms people who are not aware of it, who are earning wages in and keeping their savings in cash or bonds. Many of them are led to believe that CPI is the target to beat, which is a false low target. The real target is the money supply growth rate.

And capital gains taxes, if the cost basis is unadjusted for the rate of money supply growth, further recoup some of that value from the various harder assets that aware people try to protect themselves with.

A lot of MMT advocates act as though they found some grand formula. But really what they have re-identified is nothing new: it's that the less transparent that government spending is, the bigger it can be before people will complain. People will complain about taxes right away, but currency debasement is the sneakier method for which the consequences come with a lag. So it sidesteps hard decisions this year, and leads to bigger issues a year or two from now, when someone else can be blamed and the whole ordeal can be obfuscated.

And it's not new, despite how some MMT advocates would spin it. Currency debasement has been occurring since the adoption of coinage. And even MMT-scale currency debasement has been occurring since World War I. It is turned to so frequently because its lack of transparency allows it to occur at times and magnitudes when more transparent taxes would not.

Several years back I went deep on understanding MMT and more specifically central bank monetary operations. It is a confidence game. The Treasury (government) discovered it could appoint a monopoly bank (central bank) who has control over the currency and mandates that all other banks settle through its ‘reserves’. These reserves are actually government IOUs as a result of the central bank lending to the government which can use this for spending. The banks in turn lend out in return for privately-issued IOUs which trade 1 for 1 with government IOUs. The condition of the banks is to have enough government IOUs on hand when someone actually wants to exchange private IOUs.

The fact that the treasury and the central bank can effectively collude with one another to increase the money supply is the root of the problem. There is little incentive for government to stop spending because they can borrow whatever they need. What MMT says is that if the economy cannot absorb the money, inflation occurs, usually into assets such as real estate and eventually consumer goods. That’s exactly what has happened today. In the end, it’s not MMT’s fault, it just lays bare what is actually happening. IMHO, one way to fix it, is to enabling a competitive backing scheme - do you want your USD backed by the faith and credit of the government or by bitcoin. In some ways it would be going back to the gold standard in the late 1800s and a competitive bank note issuance scheme like what existed in Canada during that time.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.