It sounds like you're frustrated with people who dive into complex Bitcoin protocol discussions without fully understanding the material, then use Large Language Models (LLMs) as a crutch to appear more knowledgeable than they are. This can indeed be annoying, especially when it leads to misinformation or confusion in the community.

There's a certain expectation in these discussions that participants have a solid grasp of the technical details. When people rely on LLMs to fill in the gaps in their knowledge, it can undermine the integrity of the conversation and frustrate those who have invested the time to truly understand the protocols.

Moreover, it can be seen as disingenuous, as if these individuals are trying to "punch above their weight" by using LLMs to sound more authoritative than they actually are. This behavior might be perceived as lazy or even manipulative, especially in a field where expertise is highly valued.

If you're part of these discussions, it might be worth encouraging a culture where people are honest about the extent of their knowledge and are open to learning from others. After all, everyone was a beginner at some point, and there's no shame in admitting you don't know something.