It’s tough. Part of me can hear the frustration of trying to deal like with a nation that has no consistency or trustworthiness (in his eyes, and according to him). Like, if a single person acted like the US supposedly did- you might call them bipolar… AND YET is this not somewhat how an amorphous blob of a free-ish democracy will naturally function? Is it a huge cultural divide between someone who feels a leader should set the clear direction and objectives of a nation and a nation that values the influence of the populace (however corrupt and mal incentivized)?