Bazookas

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

"Shall not be infringed is pretty clear mother fucker" πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

You should be able to own anything your government can.

US-ians are armed to the teeth and still ended up with an autocratic regime so I understand it's a form of harmless decoration

Guns are decoration. What an argument to make.

I say how it is

You're arguing we have an autocracy. Hats retarded bro. We have three branches of government. Seperation of powers. That's the opposite of autocracy. Cope harder.

Yeah maybe on paper πŸ˜‚ In reality you're arresting judges and deporting people without a due process and the whole ruling is done with executive orders and probably a lot more but I don't follow news any more

And they're getting sued and losing cases and paying consequences and having to pull back...

The arrests of judges will continue until that's not the case anymore

Arrests aren't convictions. If they didn't do anything wrong, they will be back in their seat...

You never experienced a regime and it shows. I see no point in dragging this. Let's call it a day and move on

I thought I was experiencing it now. Are you right or wrong? Isn't your argument that I'm in it?

But you're coming from the point of denial. And it's been still relatively short so that's likely not enough experience

You don't have to experience something to know what it is.

Thank you for your kind words but apparently you do need to experience it more πŸ˜‰

Hence the second amendment...so when shit really hits the fan, we're not standing there in our gun free zones yelling "now what" πŸ˜‚πŸ€”

But that didn't happen πŸ˜‚

On the upside it means that even the most authoritarian US dictator could allow open carry because it doesn't pose any practical danger so I guess the OP's request could be met easily