Replying to Avatar Pablo Xannybar

This is all true but it's a different point to the one I'm making.

Absolutely physical theft of gold is much easier than Bitcoin theft, and in the past governments have confiscated (stolen) gold from their citizens.

You correctly point out that if you setup your non-custodial wallet correctly, there's no way for the state to even know how much you have (assuming you use non-KYC exchanges) let alone tax it or take it from you unless you willingly submit.

Which comes back around to highlighting the importance of self-custody. Because if it's in an ETF or an exchange it isn't really there, it's an IOU that can be digitally frozen at the click of a button.

Avatar
Brunswick 2y ago

The bitcoin ETF or bitcoin-backed-dollar is the same thing. Third party custody. It makes sense for Gold where you need your physical property protected, but for bitcoin, there is no need. The bitcoin ETF is only a temporary measure to meet the demand for bitcoin exposure from funds that are locked up in highly regulated (and highly manipulated) retirement accounts.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Pablo Xannybar 2y ago

Exactly.

Thread collapsed